III. Fundamental Human Rights Principles
A. Sources of Human Rights
1. International human rights law is derived from international law. According to
Article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, the sources of
international law are:
International conventions or treaties;
International custom as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
General principles of law recognized by the community of [civilised] nations;
Judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified
publicists…as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.
2. One of the principal sources of human rights law are treaties. These are formal,
written agreements between States. Once these treaties have been adopted,
signed and ratified they are binding upon the States who are party to the treaty.
Customary International Law
3. Customary international law consists of rules of law derived from the consistent
conduct of States acting out of the belief that the law required them to act
accordingly. Customary international law applies to all States, it is not
dependent upon ratification of a treaty.
4. It is generally held that there are two essential elements to customary
international law:
General Practice
Opinio Iuris
General Practice
5. In any circumstance, a custom may be said to exist only where there is a certain
degree of concurrency of behaviour amongst the relevant actors. According to
the International Court of Justice, for a rule to become part of customary
international law, evidence must be shown of a ‘constant and uniform usage
practiced by States’.24 State practice, in this respect, may include treaties,
decisions of national and international courts, national legislation, diplomatic
correspondence, opinions of national legal advisors and the practice of
international organisations. In some cases, a treaty provision might be
regarded as becoming part of customary international law ‘even without the
passage of any considerable period of time’ if the treaty enjoyed a ‘very
widespread and representative participation’25 and the practice includes ‘that of
States whose interests are specially affected’.26 A State that has persistently
24
ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf cases, p.14.
ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf cases, para 71.
26 ICJ, North Sea Continental Shelf cases, p.42.
25
22
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents