take all necessary steps to ensure that those responsible for using such
methods are brought to justice’.775
U. Sentencing
152.
There are no international sentencing principles but a consistency in
approach has been called for by some international bodies.776
153.
Various factors may be taken into account in sentencing including self
defence, whether the defendant was provoked and whether their response was
proportionate, distress and mental capacity.777 It has also been recommended
that governments consider restitution to victims as a sentencing option.778
154.
International human rights law protects against retrospective criminal
penalties. This is an absolute right. It protects individuals from being convicted
of criminal offences which did not exist at the time the act was committed, and
prohibits the imposition of a more severe penalty for an offence than that which
applied at the time the offence was committed. As an absolute right, it may not
be derogated from even in time of national emergency or war.
155.
An individual should not be imprisoned for failure to fulfil a contractual
obligation.779
156.
Protection from inhuman and degrading treatment will also be relevant
in the sentencing process. This will include the nature of the punishment and
reference will be made not only to acts that may cause physical but also mental
suffering.780 While corporal punishment is unacceptable,781 hard labour may be
permitted.782
V. Compensation
157.
In the event of a miscarriage of justice, Article 14(6) ICCPR and Article
19(2) of the Arab Charter provide for the rights of individuals to compensation
in the event of ‘innocence established by a final judgment’, or, in the case of the
ICCPR, 783 where:
a person has by a final decision been convicted of a criminal offence;
775
UN Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, adopted by the UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime
and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990, para 16.
776
See e.g. in Europe, Council of Europe Recommendation R(92)17 on Consistency in Sentencing.
777
Communication 1077/2002, Ibao v Philippines , 28 March 2003.
778
Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, UN Doc GA Res
40/34 (1985).
779
Article 11 ICCPR; Article 18 Arab Charter. See also Human Rights Committee Communication
91/1981, A. R. S. v Canada, UN Doc CCPR/C/OP/1 at 29 (1984), para 7; Communication 1333/2004,
Ràfols v Spain, UN Doc CCPR/C/84/D/1333/2004 (2005).
780
General Comment No.20, HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 at 151 (2003) para 5. Article 10(1) ICCPR.
781
Tyrer v UK, European Court, 25 April 1978.
782
Human Rights Committee Communication 1036/2001, Faure v Australia, 31 October 2005.
783
Article 14(6) ICCPR.
127
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents