CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 page 16 3 See the second periodic report of Senegal to the Committee against Torture, CAT/C/17/Add.14, para. 42. 4 See the concluding observations of the Committee against Torture, A/51/44, para. 117. 5 CAT/C/SR.249, para. 44. 6 Cherif Bassiouni and Edward Wise, Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997, p. 159. 7 Marc Henzelin, Le principe de l’universalité en droit pénal international. Droits et obligations pour les Etats de poursuivre et de juger selon le principe de l’universalité, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, ed. Bruylant, Basel-Brussels, 2000, p. 349. 8 Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture, 17 November 1998, A/54/44, para. 77 (f). 9 10 Communication No. 34/1995 Seid Mortesa v. Switzerland, CAT/C/18/D/34/1995, para. 11. ECHR/87/1997/871/1083, 28 October 1998. 11 See Primo Jose Essono Mika Miha v. Equatorial Guinea, communication No. 414/1990 submitted to the Human Rights Committee, A/49/40, vol. II (1994), annex IX, part O (pp. 96-100). The complainants also point out that the nationality of the author of a communication is not sufficient to establish that the author is subject to that State’s jurisdiction (see H. v. d. P. v. the Netherlands, communication No. 217/1986, A/42/40 (1987), annex IX, part C (pp. 185-186), para. 3.2. 12 Communication No. 196/1985, A/44/40 (1989), annex X, part B (pp. 189-195). 13 See Sophie Vidal Martins v. Uruguay, communication No. 57/1979, A/37/40 (1982), annex XIII (pp. 157-160). 14 General comment No. 9, 3 December 1998, E/C.12/1998/24, para. 3. 15 See A/51/44, para. 114. 16 Mark Henzelin, Le Principe d’universalité en Droit pénal international. Droit et obligation pour les Etats de poursuivre et juger selon le principe de l’universalité, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2000. -----