INSTITUTION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA whether priority in the use of the native tongue is given by the person authorized to communicate or priority is given to the use of the native tongue of the Management Board of the Company, that is, the Director and the President of the Management Board. This situation seems to neglect the interest of citizens, i.e. the public, which raises the question of the criteria that are decisive in deciding in which language the information will be published. The Ombudsmen sent a recommendation to the designated responsible authority 502. Cooperation has been established with the competent authority to implement the recommendation and is in the implementation phase. Example: Ombudsmen acted 503 upon request 504 of the Indirect Taxation Authority of Bosnia and Herzegovina, requesting an Opinion on the draft Rulebook on Prevention and Protection against Discrimination in the Indirect Taxation Authority, which was drafted for the implementation of Article 24, paragraph 4 of the Law on Prohibition of Discrimination in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Ombudsmen welcome this and all similar initiatives as they represent the implementation of the Law on Prohibition of Discrimination in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, no opinion was given to the rulebook, as it is in accordance with Article 77 of the Uniform Rules for Drafting Legal Regulations in the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina 505 prescribed that: 1) The drafting team submits the draft for approval to the head of the institution. (2) In case the draft is approved, it shall be forwarded to the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina or the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as appropriate, accompanied by: a) a rationale that fulfills the criteria of Chapter II. of these uniform rules, b) regulatory drafting approvals approved by the institution's manager, c) a draft normative act used through consultation, d) documentation of the consultations, from which it follows that the Institution is not envisaged as one of the actors participating in or approving the internal regulations of the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Example: Ombudsmen have acted on multiple complaints 506 relating to the use of a form in the Sarajevo Canton: "Statement of the name of the course, derived from the name of one of the three official languages of the constituent peoples of Bosnia and Herzegovina", in which parents are asked to state the "name of the course which is derived from the name of one of the three official languages of the constituent peoples of Bosnia and Herzegovina", which, as stated in the said form, will be listed in public documents and pedagogical documentation and records in accordance with the choice of the parents/guardians of the students, and asked to declare one of three options: a) Bosnian language and literature; b) Croatian language and literature; c) Serbian language and literature. During the investigation procedure it was established that the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of Sarajevo Canton issued Decision No. 11/01-05-990/19 dated 16 January 2019, amending the curriculum for the elementary school in the part related to the title of the subject, by changing the name Bosnian language and literature/Croatian language and literature/Serbian language and literature to change and read Bosnian language and literature, Croatian language and literature, Serbian language and literature; that there has also been a change in the ability to express students' parents, so that, in addition to declaring the name of only one of 502 Recommendation No. 205/19 of 16 September 2019. Ž-BL-06-728/19 504 Act No. 01-02-2-1515-2/19 of 9 October 2019. 505 "Official Gazette of BiH" no. 11/05, 58/14 and 60/14 506 Ž-SA-06-1361/18, Ž-SA-06-3/19 503 124