INSTITUTION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMAN OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA of discrimination, that is, they are not covered by the Law on Prohibition of Discrimination in Bosnia and Herzegovina). Example: During the reporting period, the Ombudsmen acted on a complaint 490 in which the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina 491 is designated as the responsible party. The complainant states that he addresses, inter alia, the Ombudsmen regarding the initiation of disciplinary proceedings by a decision of the Governor of the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina 492 citing one of the serious breaches of duty by filing a complaint with the Institution. The Ombudsmen made a recommendation 493 to the Governor of the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The recommendation was respected and a decision was declared null and void under item 3 of the decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings. Example: Ombudsmen acted on complaint 494 in which she designated Intesa Saopaolo Bank d.d. of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was addressed for violation of labor rights, discrimination and mobbing by Intesa Saopaolo Bank d.d. Bosnia and Herzegovina, and noted that on 14 August 2018, she received at her home address the Decision to terminate her employment contract by offering an amended employment contract and a new employment contract while on sick leave due to a high-risk pregnancy. Following the investigation procedure 495 a Recommendation was sent 496 to Intesa Saopaolo Bank d.d. Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration on recommendation received 497 stating that: “the aid client has reviewed the recommendation in question. However, as the preliminary hearing in the case pending before the Sarajevo Municipal Court is currently pending and there is no final court decision imposing an obligation on our client to do so at this time, we believe that the conditions for acting on the recommendation have not been met at this time. .. ". 10.4.4. Discrimination based on the use of language and script As in previous years, the Ombudsmen handled cases where the parties indicated that they were discriminated against in the use of their native tongue and script. The Ombudsmen emphasize that the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina does not contain a provision explicitly regulating the issue of the use of official languages, i.e. the official letter in Ž-SA-06-9/19 Decision No: 104-18-2-3005-1/18, of 18 December 2018. 492 Decision No: 104-18-2-3005-1/18, of 18 December 2018. 493 Recommendation No. P-113/19 of 10 May 2019. 494 Ž-SA-06-908/19 495 The employer of Intesa Saopaolo Bank was found to be d.d. BiH discriminated against the complainant from the time of the oral submission (May 2018), then the written report (10 August 2018) of sexual harassment and mobbing by her immediate superior by victimizing her and repeatedly harassing her by being served with termination of her contract, work with the offer of the amended employment contract, contrary to the provision of Article 60, paragraph 1 of the Labor Law of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; that he did not carry out the procedure of filling the second vacancy to which he transferred the Prosecutor, as stipulated by the provisions of the Instructions on the procedure of internal and external selection of candidates, establishment and termination of employment; that, contrary to the Law on Protection of Personal Data of Bosnia and Herzegovina, it required the complainant to submit the finding, assessment and opinion of the first-instance medical commission in order to exercise the right to reimbursement of salary during temporary work disability for more than 42 days; that he had issued her a certificate of work experience containing information when the complainant had used sick leave. 496 Recommendation No. P-289/19 of 27 December 2019. 497 Act of the Attorney-at-Law Firm of limited liability Company MARIĆ & Co (proxy of the designated responsible party) 490 491 122