At the end of this adversarial procedure, the reports of the on-site verifications and observations are published, unless special circumstances dictate otherwise, on the CGLPL's website. Any information by which the person(s) concerned may be identified is removed beforehand, to respect professional confidentiality and the confidentiality of the talks with the people who referred the case to the CGLPL. 4.1 On-site verifications conducted in 2016 From January to the end of November 2016, the CGLPL performed seven on-site verifications - three of which were carried out without prior notice. One of these verifications required several trips. Four on-site verifications were announced two to three days prior to the inspectors' arrival. Some on-site verifications concern individual situations, while others are conducted as part of thematic thought processes, which can take place prior to an opinion. Accordingly, three on-site verifications were conducted in 2016 as part of preparations for the opinion published at the start of 2017 on work and vocational training in detention. In all cases, on-site verifications – even when they concern an individual situation – are always an opportunity for the CGLPL to issue general recommendations with a view to preventing fundamental right violations. Two on-site verifications concerned individual situations. One of them assumed that observations would be made swiftly on-site with no prior adversarial talks with the responsible authority because of the law in question (right to life, protection of physical integrity, respect of physician-patient confidentiality). In the second situation, the information gathered from an adversarial procedure conducted beforehand by post did not enable the CGLPL to gain a n objective picture of the situation. The other five on-site verifications conducted in 2016 had to do with thematic work. The on-site verifications performed in this regard can concern one or a series of institutions. As part of the thought process initiated by the Chief Inspector on work and vocational training in prisons, with a view to publishing an opinion in early 2017, three on -site verifications were carried out concerning: - the range and conditions concerning work and vocational training at the Poissy longstay prison. The inspectors paid attention to the diversity of the range of work available to prisoners, particularly the Industrial management of penal institutions (RIEP) and concession workshops via the selection procedure. They were also able to observe the physical working conditions and method for calculating the workers' pay (piece work in the production workshops, by the hour at the RIEP). Lastly, they looked at questions concerning the financing of vocational training by the regional council and at the forthcoming training plan (for 2016-2017); - a scheme enabling continuity of professional activity upon leaving prison: the Facility for integration through work (SIAE) at the Œrmingen detention centre. The aim of this furniture renovation and transformation workshop, which opened on 23 May 2016, is to help rehabilitate people facing difficulties accessing professional life and enable them to do a job where they can put their skills to use. On their release, people selected in the "Emmaüs Inside" SIAE are offered a job by the association. This trial, which makes it possible to diversify the range of prison work available, provides personalised socioprofessional monitoring and opens up professional prospects upon leaving prison; - a trial to set up a medical-social facility aimed at helping disabled adults to better integrate socially through work (ESAT) at the Val-de-Reuil detention centre. This tenplace ESAT, which has been open since January 2014, provides prisoners suffering from 84