They are being asked to talk about their own work experience so try to ensure that they do not become too anecdotal in their approach. Reporting back not necessary. CASE STUDIES Methodology: This brief exercise is best conducted at the front of the group by volunteers from among the trainees plus a facilitator. The personnel should change for the second case study. Points to be highlighted/suggested areas for discussion: CASE STUDY 1 39. – Could the time of day have an influence on the decisions of prison staff? Should it?; 39. – Is the word of a man in an official uniform sufficient to deprive someone of his liberty?; 39. – Is it the responsibility of a prison official to assist another law enforcement officer who has clearly failed to fulfil his own duties adequately?; 39. – Does the existence of the international instruments protect prison officials as well as prisoners? CASE STUDY 2 39. – It is frequently the case that prison staff have to deal with difficult situations presented to them by the judicial authorities; 39. – Does the woman prisoner have some choice about who is to be informed and in what order?; 39. – Should it be assumed that this woman knows her rights, or should someone be available to assist her?; 39. – Is the likely mental and emotional state of prisoners to be taken into account by receiving officers? 46