FINDINGS OF THE MONITORING BY JURISDICTION CONCLUSIONS The best compliance with rules of procedure was observed while monitoring the hearings in administrative cases (the monitors evaluated as impeccably conducted more than half of the court hearings). At the same time, the situation with administrative offence cases is the worst – less than each third case was considered impeccably. OBSERVANCE OF THE PROCEDURE 100 80 4% 5% 2% 5% 43% 49% 18% 48% 47% 60 52% average 40 20 0 48% Civil cases 48% 55% 30% Criminal cases A similar relationship is observed in the compliance of the courts with the principles of publicity, impartiality and equality of arms, as well as the culture of conducting of the court hearings. The highest variation between the different types of adjudication is observed regarding the compliance with the publicity principle. This principle is best implemented in administrative cases, and worst – in the cases on administrative offences and in commercial cases. poor Administrative cases 46% impeccable Commercial cases COMPLIANCE OF THE COURTS WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICITY, IMPARTIALITY, EQUALITY OF ARMS AND CULTURE OF THE CONDUCTING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS 5 4 3 2 60 MONITORING OF ADHERENCE TO FAIR TRIAL STANDARDS IN UKRAINE