MONITORING PLACES OF DETENTION : A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR NGOS 37 Questions – reference points Do the NGO’s arguments clearly draw the authorities’ attention to the fact that there are also advantages for them in letting NGOs monitor the conditions of detention of persons deprived of their liberty? ■ assists State organs in fulfilling difficult and delicate tasks; ■ helps reduce public distrust and the ensuing negative rumours by having an external eye on the functioning of these organs; ■ improves the State’s image internally and externally through a concrete measure—authorisation of access—aimed at guaranteeing application of the law and respect for human rights. Would the intervention of external experts back up the NGO's position? ■ professionals active in a field or fields related to the deprivation of liberty; ■ individuals who are socially or politically influential. Can these persons intercede with the authorities concerned on behalf of the NGO before the meeting (lobbying)?