3.2. The FD on the European Supervision Order............................................................... 52
3.2.1. Addressing the challenges related to pre-trial detention:
The rationale behind the ESO.............................................................................................53
3.2.2. Practical Application of the ESO by EU Member States .....................................................54
3.2.3. Challenges regarding the practical application of the FD ESO ...........................................56
3.3. The Framework Decision on Probation and Alternative Sanctions.....................................58
3.4. Framework Decision on the Transfer of Prisoners .............................................................59
3.5. Framework Decisions on Detention as Chances for the Prevention of Ill-treatment:
Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................61
Conclusions.........................................................................................................................61
Recommendations .............................................................................................................62
PART TWO
HOW STRENGTHENED ENGAGEMENT BETWEEN THE JUDICIARY AND NATIONAL PREVENTIVE
MECHANISMS CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE PREVENTION OF ILL-TREATMENT ................................ 63
Chapter 1.
The role of judiciary and NPMs in the prevention of ill-treatment .............................................. 64
1.1. The role of the judiciary in the prevention of ill-treatment ...............................................64
1.2. The role of NPMs in the prevention of ill-treatment .........................................................65
1.3. NPMs and the judiciary – The benefits of engagement......................................................66
1.4. NPMs and Judiciary – the current status of engagement ..................................................68
Chapter 2.
Methods and modes of engagement to contribute to the prevention of
ill-treatment on a national level................................................................................................. 70
2.1. Issuing recommendations to the judiciary..........................................................................70
2.2. Institutional Exchange.........................................................................................................74
2.3. NPM contributions to court proceedings...........................................................................79
Chapter 3.
Methods and modes of engagement that can contribute to the prevention of ill-treatment in
cross-border proceedings........................................................................................................... 85
3.1. NPMs addressing the challenges of Framework Decisions on detention ..........................85
3.2. The potential in using NPM reports in cross-border transfer cases....................................86
3