CAT/C/54/D/540/2013 Turkey. Moreover, the Committee recalls that the State party has established that appropriate physical and psychological medical care is available in Turkey. The Committee has no reason to question those conclusions. The Committee has previously found that the fact that a complainant suffers from psychological problems cannot, in itself, be seen as sufficient grounds creating an obligation for the State party to refrain from expelling him or her. 12 8.9 Taking into account all the information made available to it, the Committee considers that the complainant has failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he would face a foreseeable, real and personal risk of being subjected to torture if returned to his country of origin. 9. The Committee, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention, therefore concludes that the return of the complainant to Turk ey would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention. __________________ 12 10/10 Communication No. 356/2008, N.S. v. Switzerland, decision adopted on 6 May 2010, para. 7.5. GE.15-11115