CAT/OP/C/57/4 28. In addition, the national preventive mechanism of the receiving State should also have the capacity to visit those in detention on the basis of such agreements, as a natural consequence of its general right to visit all those deprived of their liberty on the basis of public authority and under the jurisdiction and control of the State party. 29. After undertaking such visits, the national preventive mechanism of the receiving State should be able to present its recommendations and enter into a preventive dialogue with the authorities of both the receiving and sending State. The agreement entered into between the receiving and sending States should provide for that and should permit the variation of its terms in the light of the recommendations made. 30. The national preventive mechanisms of the sending and receiving States should liaise regarding the conduct of such visits, and should consider undertaking joint visits in such circumstances and, where possible, making joint recommendations. 31. The recommendations made ought to reflect the established approaches of the national preventive mechanisms in question, which themselves will reflect the approach of the Subcommittee and international standards. In cases where there is a difference of approach and expectation, the higher expectations will be applicable to those detained on the basis of such agreements as a reflection of the overarching principles of prevention. 23