32 3. The NPM’s cooperation with civil society organizations (in the cases of the Fejér County police lock-up, Forensic, Psychiatric and Mental Institution, the juvenile correctional institutions and the 14th-district custody room of the MPHB), the NPM was consulting with the authorities concerned. The NPM’s website had been significantly transformed, and its contents were continuously updated. At the second CCB meeting held in 2018, the representative of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee inquired about the response received by the NPM regarding its objection to the so-called “caged” isolation ward in its report on the Debrecen Reformatory of the MoHC. The leader of the inquiry said that in response to the NPM’s initiatives, the institution informed the NPM that the “caged” isolation ward would be transformed or completely eliminated, and another room would be set up for the purposes of isolation. The NPM asked the institution to report on the practical implementation of the latter. The representative of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee remarked in connection with the report on the Márianosztra Strict and Medium Regime Prison that in 2016 the Hungarian Helsinki Committee also visited the institution. Their staff members, who visited the premises on several occasions, exposed numerous serious problems, including the use of the security isolation ward and the impossibility to identify the members of the operational team. As a result of their report, the Hungarian Prison Service Headquarters executed a targeted control in the Márianosztra Strict and Medium Regime Prison, and subsequently, the management was also replaced. The HHC expected to read about the happenings of 2016 and the current situation that evolved in their wake, but the document contained no information on that. The representative of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee missed reading observations regarding the practice of camera use, nor did she find information on whether the protective equipment (such as dust masks) of detainees involved in labour programmes had been replaced as proposed by the Hungarian Helsinki Committee. Although problems related to the use of the security isolation ward did appear in the report, they only did so in few paragraphs. According to her, the report did not adequately reflect on the especially serious and objectionable practice of the use of physical violence, which, according to the visiting experience of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, was common at that institution. She inquired whether the methodology followed during the visits of the NPM makes it possible for the visiting delegation to return on site at a later date if the inspection was hindered or restricted. The staff members of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee were hindered in the performance of their inspection at the Márianosztra Strict and Medium Regime Prison, so they went back several times, partly to put pressure on the facility, and partly to investigate the problems discovered more thoroughly. She wanted to know whether the visiting delegation also faced hindrance in the Márianosztra Strict and