CEDAW/C/68/D/79/2014 7.9 In that regard, the Committee notes that the State party’s authorities found that the author’s account lacked credibility owing to factual inconsistencies and a lack of substantiation. The Committee further observes that the limited information provided by the author to the Committee corroborates the determination of the State party ’s authorities that the author ’s claims lacked substantiation. In addition, the Committee notes that the author made an insufficient link between the alleg ed facts and the violation of the articles of the Convention that she invokes vis -à-vis Denmark. The Committee further notes that the State party took into consideration the general situation in Somalia, as well as the existence of a family network consist ing of her parents and three siblings in the village of Ceel Garas, from which she originates. 7.10 In the light of the foregoing, and while not underestimating the concerns that may legitimately be expressed with regard to the general human rights situati on in Somalia, in particular concerning the human rights of women, the Committee considers that nothing on file permits it to conclude that the State party ’s authorities failed to give sufficient consideration to the author ’s asylum claims, or that the national-level examination of her asylum case otherwise suffered from any procedural defect. 8. The Committee therefore decides that: (a) The communication is inadmissible under article 4 (2) (c) of the Optional Protocol; (b) 8/8 This decision shall be communicated to the State party and to the author. 17-21664