CCPR/C/115/D/2284/2013 demonstrate the existence of a personal risk to the author 25 or provide substantive grounds for concluding that the author would face a real risk of irreparable harm if he were to be forcibly returned to Chad. 26 9.7 The Committee therefore concludes that the author’s deportation to Chad would not constitute a violation of article 7 of the Covenant. 10. The Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the Covenant, finds that the author’s removal to Chad would not violate his rights under article 7 of the Covenant. __________________ 25 26 GE.15-21665 See communication No. 2007/2010, X. v. Denmark, Views adopted on 26 March 2014, para. 9.2; Committee against Torture communications Nos. 282/2005, S.P.A. v. Canada, decision adopted on 7 November 2006; 333/2007, T.I. v. Canada, decision adopted on 15 November 2010; and 344/2008, A.M.A. v. Switzerland, decision adopted on 12 November 2010; and Human Rights Committee , A.R.J. v. Australia, para. 6.6. See X. v. Denmark, para. 9.2; and X. v. Sweden, para. 5.18. 13/13