CAT/C/58/D/600/2014 8. Consequently, the Committee considers that the material before it does not enable it to conclude that the complainant would run a real, foreseeable, personal and present risk of being subjected to torture within the meaning of article 3 of the Convention if returned to Sri Lanka. 9. In the light of the foregoing, the Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, concludes that the complainant’s removal to Sri Lanka by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention. 12