Interim measures granted and State party response Requested and acceded to by the State party. Remedy recommended The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning Tahir Hussain Khan to Pakistan. Due date for State party response None Date of reply None State party response No information provided to the Rapporteur, however during the discussion of the State party report to the Committee against Torture in May 2005, the State party stated that the complainant had not been deported. Complainant’s response None Committee’s decision Follow-up dialogue ongoing Case Falcon Rios, 133/1999 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Mexican to Mexico Views adopted on 30 November 2004 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Requested and acceded to by the State party. Remedy recommended Relevant measures Due date for State party response None Date of reply Latest reply on 14 January 2008 (had previously responded on 9 March 2005 and 17 May 2007). State party response On 9 March 2005, the State party provided information on follow-up. It stated that the complainant had submitted a request for a risk assessment prior to return to Mexico and that the State party will inform the Committee of the outcome. If the complainant can establish one of the motives for protection under the Immigration and Protection of Refugee’s Law, he will be able to present a request for permanent residence in Canada. The Committee’s decision will be taken 144