voluntarily and who have a strong sense of solidarity as a peer group. A concept that is intended to promote seamless interaction between those minor patients who are here under the Hospitalisation Act and those who have been admitted voluntarily, as they are in need of treatment, also involves risks. The unintended result, which is difficult to foresee in advance, is that both groups can become overwhelmed and thus create the potential risk of re-traumatisation. Frequent confrontations between adolescents, who are highly aggressive due to their illness and the other patients can increase fear depending on the dynamics of the group. For example, Commission 3 observed a massive outburst of aggression by an adolescent, and could see for itself that his behaviour, but also the experience of how the acute incident was dealt with, was experienced as threatening by female patients. The clinic is planning to develop an electronic notification system when someone leaves the ward as an alternative to locking the door to the ward, thus providing the scope of freedom that does not prevent a permitted, intentional change of venue. In the opinion of the NPM, this will require accompanying measures in order to truly exclude potential risks that could spread. The NPM believes that – even for alternative solutions – an eye must be kept on overwhelming scenarios for minors resulting from the joint care situation in the form of a concomitant evaluation. Alternative to locking the ward door is being planned  Locking ward doors must be considered a measure that restricts freedom and must not result in an inadmissible “de facto compulsory admission” of uninvolved minors.  Potentially overwhelming situations that can result from joint care of adolescents, some of whom are being treated under the Hospitalisation of Mentally Ill Persons Act and some of whom are being treated voluntarily, must be minimised. 2.2.2.5. Deficits in psychiatric care in Carinthia During visits to the Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutical Medicine at the Regional Hospital Villach, Commission 3 found that space is extremely limited. Some patients are being cared for in rooms with six beds. Furthermore, the Regional Hospital Villach does not have the capacity required for the territory covered by the hospital to ensure the care of patients placed in a protected area. Insufficient capacity in Regional Hospital Villach These inadequate framework conditions result in the fact that many patients, who are admitted under the Hospitalisation Act, are being brought to the Department of Psychiatry at the Regional Hospital Klagenfurt by ambulance after their initial examination. Transfer to Regional Hospital Klagenfurt necessary These transfers of patients in acute danger of self-harm or of harming others are frequently carried out without a physician and sometimes 56

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents