Neuropsychiatric Recovery and Rehabilitation Center, although it had a capacity of 25 people, at the time of the visit, it provided services to a number of 35 beneficiaries); ● the center did not have spaces for daily activities, equipped with adequate furniture; ● in the center there were only two common bathrooms, one of which was locked and used as a warehouse; the other bathroom (equipped with bathtub and shower) was open, but not suitable for use by people with disabilities or reduced mobility (it was not adapted and the small size of the shower made it difficult to use) (Care and Assistance Center for Adults with Disabilities Puchenii Mari); ● the center did not have its own means of transport, which made it difficult for the beneficiaries to travel outside the center for interdisciplinary consultations and non-urgent specialized medical interventions; ● during the monitoring of the Care and Assistance Center for Adults with Disabilities Puchenii Mari, the NPM team was informed of the situation of two beneficiaries who were investigated at the Ploiești County Emergency Hospital (Emergency Reception Unit), as a result of some health problems that have exceeded the possibilities of intervention at the level of the center; the beneficiaries were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection and, although the test result came much faster (the result was negative), the representatives of the center became aware of it after a longer period (more than a week), the beneficiaries being kept, in all this time, in the room; - residential centers for children: ● overcrowding (Alexandria Maternal Center); ● the working procedures, registers and all the organization and functioning documents of the center were not updated according to the Order of the Minister of Labor and Social Justice no. 81/2019 on the approval of minimum quality standards for social services organized as maternal centers; ● in the Emergency Reception Center for Children Slatina were missing: the record of the medicines and sanitary materials purchased, a Register containing professional documents of the psychologist, and in the Register of special incidents there were no records; ● not all files contained the quarterly reports on the evolution of the beneficiaries' situation during the residence in the center and the services provided, and the evaluation forms were not filled in properly (Alexandria Maternal Center); ● no quarterly programs were developed for recreation and socialization; ● no social integration / reintegration plan was developed and implemented, including specific activities, therapies and services; ● no continuous professional training courses have been taken by the staff; ● there was no separate refrigerator for storing food samples (Slatina Children's Emergency Reception Center); - quarantine centers: ● regarding the rights ensured to persons placed in institutionalized quarantine, there were institutions of the prefect who replied that the personal rights of quarantined persons are respected according to law, but didn’t specifically indicate what rights they referred to Caraș-Severin), some answered generically that the quarantined persons, as well as the personnel working in these centers are guaranteed all the rights in the conditions generated by the emergency situation (Bihor, Botoșani, Hunedoara etc.), and other prefect institutions did not provide information on this issue (for example, Bucharest, Alba, Arges, Bacau, Giurgiu); in the case of the Techirghiol Spa and Recovery Sanatorium, the information provided by the sanatorium specified that the quarantined persons have been informed of their rights and obligations through the materials displayed in each room; those materials, communicated to the NPM team and visible in the submitted photos, however, contained a list of rules of conduct and internal order, which had to be followed during quarantine, as well as the schedule of meals, bed linen exchange and household waste removal; no list of rights was found; ● regarding the restrictions provided for quarantined persons, it was found that there was no unitary approach, at national level, in this regard, most institutions of the prefect responding generically: the restrictions are those derived from compliance with the rules adopted to prevent the spread of the new Coronavirus (Bucharest); the restrictions are those provided by the Decisions of CNSSU, Military Ordinances, Orders of the Minister of 14