Communication No. 20/1977 Submitted by: M. A. in December 1977 Alleged victim: Author's husband State party: S Date of decision: 25 January 1978 (third session) Transmittal to State party under rule 91—Request to State party for information on admissibility, available remedies, whereabouts and state of health of alleged victim Article of Optional Protocol: 5 (2) (a) and (b) The Human Rights Committee decides: (a) That the communication be transmitted to the State party concerned under rule 91 of the provisional rules of procedure requesting from the State party infor­ mation and observations relevant to the question of ad­ missibility of the communication. If the State party con­ tends that domestic remedies have not been exhausted, it is requested to give, details of the effective remedies available to the alleged victim in this case. If the State party objects that the same matter is already being ex­ amined under another procedure of international in­ vestigation or settlement, it should give details including information on the stage reached in those proceedings; Ф) That the State party be requested to inform the Committee of the alleged victim's whereabouts and his state of health; (c) That it should be explained to the author that the Committee is precluded under article 5 (2) {a) of the Op­ tional Protocol from considering a communication if the same matter is being examined under another pro­ cedure of international investigation or settlement. In this connection the author should be requested to state whether a case concerning the alleged victim has been submitted by her or, to her knowledge, by any other person to the Inter-American Commission on Human rights. If so, she should give details, including any infor­ mation in her possession as to the stage reached in the procedure before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, so as to assist the Committee in deter­ mining whether the same matter is being examined under that procedure; (d) That the State party and the author be informed that their information and observations should reach the Human Rights Committee, in care of the Division of Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva, within six weeks of the date of the request; (e) That the Secretary-General transmit any informa­ tion or observations received to the other party as soon as possible to enable the other party to comment thereon if it so wishes. Any such comments should reach the Human Rights Committee, in care of the Division of Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva, within four weeks of the date of the transmittal; if) That the text of this decision be communicated to the State party and the author. Communication No. 22/1977 Submitted by: O. E. on 30 December 1977 Alleged victim: Author's son State party: S Date of decision: 25 January 1978 (third session) Transmittal to State party under rule 91—Request for information on admissibility and available remedies—Interim measures—Request that alleged victim not be expelled by State party—Request to author for substantiation, and information on ex­ haustion of domestic remedies The Human Rights Committee decides: (a) That the communication be transmitted to the State party concerned under rule 91 of the provisional rules of procedure requesting from the State party infor­ mation and observations relevant to the question of ad­ missibility of the communication. If the State party con­ tends that domestic remedies have not been exhausted, it is requested to give details of the effective remedies available to the alleged victim in this case. If the State party objects that the same matter is already being ex­ amined under another procedure of international in­ vestigation or settlement, it should give details including information on the stage reached in those proceedings; (¿>) That the State party be asked to inform the Com­ mittee whether deportation or extradition of the alleged victim to country X is being contemplated; (c) That the State party be informed, in accordance with rule 86 of the provisional rules of procedure, of the view of the Committee that pending further considera­ tion of the case, the alleged victim, having sought refuge in S, should not be handed over or expelled to country X; (d) That the author be requested to furnish informa­ tion (i) In substantiation of the claim that each of the ar­ ticles 7, 9, 13, 14 and 15 of the International