Temporary Detention Isolator (TDI) under the
subordination of Human Rights Protection and
Monitoring Main Division of the Administration of the
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia
TREATMENT
During the monitoring, finding that has to be considered as certainly positive, is that none of the detainees in temporary
detention has expressed any complaints as regards the detention facility staff, concerning any sort of inappropriate
treatment. The same can be said of released prisoners from other prisons.
It is regrettable, that during 2012, some instances of inappropriate behaviour by the detention facility staff were
identified and revealed. The Office of Public Defender received appeals in which detained individuals raised concerns
and drew attention to inappropriate conduct, behaviour and treatment of prisoners by Temporary Detention Isolator
staff. This was especially seen with regards to individuals with different political views, who had been taking part in
opposition activities. The same was identified with regards to persons detained after 26 May 2011, who subsequently
were put into temporary detention isolators. (Further see Public Defender Parliamentary Report, 2011).
The Cases of Manuchar A., Irakli C., and Irakli D.
On 27 May 2012, during Public Defender’s representative visit of these individuals in the temporary detention isolator,
all three were stating that they had not received food for the entire day and had not been provided with bed sheets. Also,
according to these individuals, when being put in the temporary detention isolator, the staff ordered them to take off
their clothes and do squats three times in a row.
In his explanation given to Public Defender’s representative, Manuchar A. stated that during his administrative
detention period (26-29 May) the temporary detention isolator staff verbally abused him in a constant manner, as well
as constantly reminded him of his political views. Additionally, according to Manuhar A, it was often the case that
temporary detention isolator staff were hitting his cell door and making noise, so that the prisoner did not have the
possibility to sleep.
According to the explanatory note of Irakli D. (detention period: 26-30 May) and Irakli C. (detention period: 26-31
May), they too were subjected to verbal abuse by the temporary detention isolator staff. According to the latter, the
NPM Report
2012
In May 2012, in the Regional Temporary Detention Isolator for Imereti, Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti, the
representatives of Public Defender met with Manuchar A., Irakli C., and Irakli D. who had been placed in administrative
detention. According to these individuals, there had been instances when the temporary detention isolator staff was
treating them inappropriately.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents