MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 43 PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ROZAKIS While I share the opinion of the majority of the Court that in the circumstances of the case there has been a violation of Article 34 and no violation of Article 3 of the Convention, I am unable to follow them in their finding that there has been no violation of Article 6, for the reasons elaborated by Judges Sir Nicolas Bratza, Bonello and Hedigan in their joint partly dissenting opinion, to which I fully subscribe.