86 ► The appeal in the interest of the law regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions of Art. 30 paragraph (1) lit. a) of Law no. 263/2010 regarding the unitary system of public pensions with subsequent modifications and completions, and Art. 3 point 1 of the Mining Law no. 85/2003, with the subsequent modifications and completions, in the sense of determining whether the activity carried out within the units of geological exploration or underground operations is considered activity carried out in a «mining unit» and can be classified under special working conditions. The solution of the High Court of Cassation and Justice By Decision no. 9/2019, the High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law formulated by the People's Advocate and, as a consequence, established that: in interpreting and applying the provisions of Art. 30 paragraph (1) letter a) of Law no. 263/2010 regarding the unitary system of public pensions, with subsequent amendments and completions, and Art. 3 point 1 of the Mining Law no. 85/2003, with the subsequent modifications and completions, the activity carried out within the units of geological prospecting or underground operations cannot be considered activity carried out in a "mining unit" and classified under special working conditions. In this file, the High Court of Cassation and Justice established an interpretation contrary to the point of view expressed by the People's Advocate and the Public Ministry. ► The appeal in the interest of the law having as object the interpretation and application of Art. 22 of Law no. 104/2003 regarding the manipulation of human corpses and the removal of organs and tissues from bodies for transplantation, republished The solution of the High Court of Cassation and Justice By Decision no. 24/2019, the High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law formulated by the People's Advocate, within the meaning of the point of view expressed by our institution, and established the recognition of the jobs of the personnel that carry out their activity in the pathological anatomy and mortuary services of the hospitals, as well as of the personnel from the university disciplines of anatomy, histology, pathological anatomy and the department of cell biology as being classified ex-lege in the category of jobs under special conditions, without having to follow the methodology provided by secondary normative acts. ► The appeal in the interest of the law having as object the non-unitary interpretation and application of the provisions of Art. 59 paragraph (2) and Art. 64 paragraph (2) of Law no. 192/2006 regarding the mediation and organization of the profession of mediator, with the subsequent amendments and completions, requesting the High Court of Cassation and Justice to issue a decision to determine whether the court can take note of the mediation agreement, by which the parties agreed about the dissolution of the marriage and the resolution of the accessory aspects of the divorce. The solution of the High Court of Cassation and Justice By Decision no. 33/2019, the High Court of Cassation and Justice has admitted the appeal in the interest of the law formulated by the People's Advocate and has decided that the court cannot take note of the mediation agreement regarding the understanding of the parties regarding the dissolution of the marriage. Regarding the resolution of the accessory aspects of the divorce, the court can take note of the mediation agreement having this object. In this file, the solution delivered by the High Court of Cassation and Justice was in agreement with the point of view of the People's Advocate and of the Public Ministry. 1.5. Resolution of petitions requesting the referral of the High Court of Cassation and Justice in order to unify the non-unitary judicial practice PEOPLE’S ADVOCATE ANNUAL REPORT 2019