27 96 Habeas corpus is a Latin phrase which literally means ‘that you have the body’ and, in a legal context, is a means through which a person can challenge unlawful detention or imprisonment. 97 Mohammed v Obama, 689 F.Supp.2d 38, 61 (D.D.C. 2009). 98 Mohammed v Obama, 689 F.Supp.2d 38, 66 (D.D.C. 2009). 99 LaFrance v Bohlinger, 499 F.2d 29, 35 (1st Cir. 1974). 100 Nardone v United States, 308 U.S. 338, 340 (1939). 101 Cabrera-García and Montiel Flores v Mexico (Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs) Series C No. 220, 26 November 2010, para 167. 102 HRC, General Comment No. 32, para 6. See similarly, UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, 6 August 2008, A/63/223, para 45(d), which refers to ‘the information obtained at such hearings, or derived solely as a result of leads disclosed’. 103 Nuon Chea and Others, Case No. 002/19-09-2007IECCCrrC. 104 Gäfgen v Germany (2010) 52 EHRR 1, para 163. 105 Jalloh v Germany, App no. 54810/00, 11 July 2006, para 105. 106 Gäfgen v Germany. 107 Jalloh v Germany. 108 Gäfgen v Germany, paras 178, 180, 187. 109 Jalloh v Germany. 110 Ibid (Joint Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judges Rozakis, Tulkens, Jebens, Ziemele, Bianku and Power), para 5. 111 Gäfgen v Germany, para 73. 112 Stephen C. Thaman, Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law (Springer, 2012), p.232. 113 For examples, Utah v Strieff 136 S.Ct. 2056 (2016); United States v Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-922 (1984). 114 Evidence Act 1995, Section 138. 115 Illegally Obtained Evidence case, Supreme Court Judgment, 7 September 1978 (Case Number 1976 (A) 865). 116 Criminal Procedure Law, Article 54.