66 Tainted by Torture: Examining the Use of Torture Evidence | 2018 Association for the Prevention of Terrorism, ‘The Exclusionary Rule: international law prohibits the use of evidence obtained through torture’, APT Background Bulletin (2012). Association for the Prevention of Torture, ‘Exclusion of evidence obtained by torture’. Bowen, P., ‘Does the renaissance of common law rights mean that the Human Rights Act 1998 is now unnecessary?’, European Human Rights Law Review (2016). Conectas Human Rights, ‘Shielded Torture: how the institutions of the justice system perpetuate violence in custody hearings’, February 2017. CPS, ‘Confessions, Unfairly Obtained Evidence and Breaches of PACE’ (2016). Dannreuther, A., ‘Fresh Calls for Independent Inquiry Into UK Rendition And Torture’ (2016). Docksey, L., ‘Complicity in Torture – the Truth Britain Doesn’t Want to Face. When will the UK Obey its Own Laws?’ (2016). European Human Rights Law Review, ‘Bulletin: counter-terrorism and human rights’ (2015). ‘Evidence Supplied by a Foreign State which may have been Obtained Under Torture’, International Journal of Evidence and Proof (2005). Foley, C., ‘A manual for judges and prosecutors’. Friedman, D., ‘A common law of human rights: history, humanity and dignity’, European Human Rights Law Review (2016). Grady, K., ‘International crimes in the courts of England and Wales’, 693, Criminal Law Review (2014). Grief, N., ‘The exclusion of foreign torture evidence: a qualified victory for the rule of law’, European Human Rights Law Review (2006). Halstead, P., Unlocking Human Rights (Routledge, 2012). International Commission of Jurists, ‘Bulletin: counter-terrorism and human rights’, 347, European Human Rights Law Review (2016). International Forensic Expert Group, ‘Statement on Hooding’, 21(3), Torture (2011). Justice, ‘Torture in English Law’ (2015). Liberty, ‘Article 3: No torture, inhuman or degrading treatment’. Liberty, ‘Closed courts and secret evidence’. Liberty, ‘UK Complicity in Torture’. Newman, Daniel, Legal Aid Lawyers and the Quest for Justice (Hart Publishing, 2013). O’Boyle, M., ‘Emergency government and derogation under the ECHR’, European Human Rights Law Review (2016). Ormerod, D. and Perry, D. (eds.), Blackstone’s Criminal Practice 2017 (Oxford University Press, 2016). Pattenden, R., ‘Admissibility in criminal proceedings of third party and the real evidence obtained by methods prohibited by UNCAT’, International Journal of Evidence and Proof (2006). REDRESS, ‘Ending Threats and Reprisals against Victims of Torture and Related International Crimes’ (2009). Simonsen, N., ‘Evidence Obtained by Torture: Is it Ever Admissible?’ (2012). The Crown Prosecution Service, ‘Confessions, Unfairly Obtained Evidence and Breaches of PACE’. The Guardian, ‘High court rules it unlawful to put hood over suspect’s head’ (2011). Thienel, T., ‘The Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Torture under International Law’, 17(2), European Journal of International Law (2006). Turpin, C and Tomkins, A., British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials, 6th edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2007). Case law A & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2) [2005] UKHL 71. B v Secretary State for the Home Department, SC/9/2005. Chahal v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 413. Ireland v United Kingdom, 25 Eur. H.R. Rep. (ser. A) (1978). M2 v Secretary of State for the Home Department, SC/124/2014. Ndiki Mutua and Others v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2012] EWHC 2678 (QB). Omar Othman (Aka Abu Qatada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, SC/15/2005. R v Davis [1990] Crim. L.R. 860. R v Fulling [1987] 2 All E.R. 65S. R v Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court, Ex p Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42. R v Latif [1996] 1 WLR 104. R v Looseley, Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 2000) [2001] UKHL 53.