64 Tainted by Torture: Examining the Use of Torture Evidence | 2018 R v Swaffield; Pavic v R [1998] 192 CLR 159. R v Zhang [2000] NSWSC 1099. Legislation Australian Constitution 1901 (Cth). Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth). Commonwealth Evidence Act 1995. Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). Crimes Legislation Amendment (Torture Prohibition and Death Penalty Abolition) Act 2010 (Cth). Criminal Code 1913 (WA). Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). Criminal Code Compilation Act (1913) (WA). Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA). Evidence Act 1906 (WA). Evidence Act 1995 (Cth). Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Foreign Evidence Act 1994 (Cth). Health and Community Services Complaints Act (NT). Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth). Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). Other Australian Human Rights Commission. Australian Law Reform Commission. Federal Ombudsman. Human Rights Law Centre Australia. United Nations Association of Australia. Brazil Articles CNJ, ‘CNJ firma acordo com entidade internacional para prevenir tortura no país’ (8 September 2016). Conectas Human Rights, Shielded Torture: how the institutions of the justice system perpetuate violence in custody hearings (February 2017). Case law Appeal # 0004290-80.2010.8.26.0431 of the Court of Appeals of the State of Sao Paulo. Appeal # 0213754-79.2010.8.26.0000 of the Courts of Justice of Sao Paulo. Appeal # 1.0000.00.159827-5/000 of the Court of Appeals of the State of Minas Gerais. Appeal # 2.0000.00.406378-5/000 of the Court of Appeals of the State of Minas Gerais. Case No. 9167122-80.2003.8.26.0000 of the Court of Appeals of Sao Paulo (also referenced as Appeal # 00807524.3/6-0000-000 of the Court of Justice of the State of Sao Paulo). Habeas Corpus, #78708, Federal Supreme Court, 9 March 1999. Legislation and legislative reports Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure. Brazilian Constitution / Federal Constitution of Brazil. Federal Decree no. 40 of 15 February 1991.