measures
undertaken
based
on its
findings.
In addition,
clarification
was
requested
of the
rules
and
regulations
governing
the
use
of
firearms
by the
police
and
security
forces
in Northern
Ireland
and
of the inquest
procedure
in
cases
of killings
by members
of the security
forces.
In that
regard,
it
was
asked
how many
deaths
had occurred
as a result
of the use of force
by the
police;
in how many
such
cases
had
the
victims
been
unarmed;
whether
any
inquiries
had
been
initiated:
and whether
disciplinary
proceedings
had been
conducted
against
those
found
guilty.
It
was
also
inquired
what
steps
had
been taken
to prevent
suicide
among
persons
detained
under
immigration
powersr
how many
death
sentences
had
been
imposed
in Hong
Kong
in the
past
decade:
and
whether
the
Government
was
considering
abolishing
the death penalty
in the
dependent
territories,
particularly
in Hong
Kong,
in
view
of
the
transfer
of
sovereignty
in
1991.
379.
In his
reply,
th.;
representative
of the
State
party
said
that,
when
summoned
to support
the
civil
authorities
, nlembers
of the armed
forces
were
present
purely
to assist
as xxeeded
and did
not
themselves
possess
police
powers.
Only
that
degree
of force
which
was
reasonable
in the
circumstances
WGG permissible.
Detailed
instructions
were
provided
on the
us8
of firearms,
iixdicating
that
they
were
to be used
as a last
resort
where
there
was
a threat
to life
and,
where
practicable,
after
due warning
had been given.
Members
of
the
armed
forces
and the
police
could
be prosecuted
if
they
used
firearms
unlawfully.
Ten
individual
incidents
in which
deaths
had
been
caused
by
members
of the
security
forces
had occurred
in Northern
Ireland
in
1990,
cvmpared
to four
and
six
in 1989 and 1988,
respectively.
Each
incident
had
been
fully
inveotigated
and the
evidence
obtained
had
been
weighed
by an
independent
official.
That
procedure
had
resulted
in
the
institution
of
crimioal
proceedings
against
some
members
of the security
forces.
The
question
of suicide
and
self-harm
in
prisons
was taken
very
seriously
by the
cjovernment,
which
w&G seeking
to reduce
the
incidence
of those
phenomena
to a
minimum.
With
respect
to detention
under
immigration
powers,
only
a small
proportion
of the
approximately
20,000
persons
who were
refused
entry
into
the
country
each
year
were
detained,
Steps
had
been
taken
to prevent
suicide
occurring
in such
facilities.
WheYever
possib18,
people
were
granted
temporary
admission
instead
of being
detained.
Coadicions
in
special
detention
facilitfGs
were
kept
as congenial
as possible
and
such
facilities
were
thoroughly
inspected.
A board
of visitors
had
been
established
to hear
corr.2iaints.
300.
The
Government
had
become
concerned
about
the
discrepancy
between
its
practice
and that
of the
dependent
territories
in
the
Caribbean
with
respect
to the
death
penalty.
Although
public
opinion
in
the
Caribbean
Territories
ten&d
to favour
retention
of ths
death
penalty,
it
had
been
announced
on
26 March
1991
that
an Order
in Council
would
be moved
to substitute
life
imprisomnent
for
the
death
penalty
:& murder
caG8G
in
the
Cayman
Islands,
the
British
virgin
Islaxxds,
the
Turks
and Caicos
Islands,
Montserrut
and
Anguilla.
The
last
death
sentence
in Hong
Kong
had been
carried
out
in
November
1966,
Gtd
since
then
the
death
sentencee
of 243 persons
had
been
commuted
to life
imprisonment
or specific
prison
sentences.
However,
most
people
in Hong
Kong
wished
to retain
the
death
penalty
as a deterrent
to
serious
crime.
Purthermore,
according
to the
Joint
Declaration,
the
laws
currently
in force
in Hong
Kong
would
rexnain
basically
unchanged
after
1997
and,
therefore,
the
death
penalty
would
not
become
applicable
to a broacier
range
of
crimes
unless
the
Hong
Kong
Administration
GO decided.
-9%-
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents