and appointment of legal representatives. It was also mentioned that the situation was discussed with the representatives of D.G.A.S.P.C. Prahova, who described the legal medico-legal assessment and indictment procedure, as well as aspects related to the coverage of fees for medico-legal assessment, transportation, etc. and their inclusion in the institution’s budget. C.R.R.N. Plătărești, Călărași county answered that the documentation for indictment and appointment of legal representatives for the 29 beneficiaries had been drawn up, and some of the files were sent for solution to the Legal Service of DGASPC Călărași. Besides, D.G.A.S.P.C. Călărași sent an internal note to the management of the Centre setting out deadlines and responsible persons for each individual recommendation. Thus, they were asked to draw up the specific documentation for the indictment of the 29 beneficiaries of the Centre, as well as take the required legal action. (C.R.R.N. Plătărești, Călărași) ● As for the pursuit of actions to set out measures for the protection of beneficiaries, since 31 indicted beneficiaries were unable to manage their goods and properly defend their interests as of the date of the visit, the management mentioned that an action to establish the legal representative of indicted beneficiaries had been initiated, by means of correspondence with the municipalities of the settlements of origin, with a view to identifying a family member or any other person in the community that could be appointed guardian (C.R.R.N. Războieni, Neamț county). Regarding social assistance and activities organized in the centre ● no case officer was allocated for the 50 beneficiaries of the Centre, which resulted in a low number of actions for family reintegration, and the tasks belonging to the social assistance activity were delegated to other types of staff (the social worker position of the Centre was vacant). Relevant documents were not properly filled in and not always took into account the changes in the beneficiary’s daily lives. Personal intervention plans were similar, though the beneficiaries had been included in the public care system for long periods of time. When the case was taken by another manager, the latter could not determine significant changes because s/he was replaced by someone else soon. The absence of a specialist in the staff of the centre results in the failure to perform specific activities or the delegation of tasks to other staff without specialized studies. (C.I.A.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova county). 124