Recommendation: to re-assess case management activities and match the attributions of the case manager and case officer with the ones stipulated in the minimum quality standards. Answer: The Centre mentioned that case officers are appointed by decision of the general director of DGASPC Prahova. ● the presence in the centre of a young beneficiary who submitted repeated requests for transfer to other centres where, in his opinion, he could have developed new skills, for instance perform lucrative activities. Thus, the specific analysis of this beneficiary had to be analysed and he should have been channelled to other centres that could provide alternatives to autonomy, personal qualification, compensated work. His placement in a centre that cannot provide enough activities and customized services at a young age is an infringement of his rights to social reintegration. (C.I.A.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova county).Recommendation: to re-analyse the specific situation of beneficiaries with high skills and take the compulsory action to re-channel them to centres that may provide alternatives to autonomy, personal qualification, work and social reintegration. Answer: The Centre enclosed the transfer decision issued by the Committee for the Assessment of Adults with Disabilities of DGASPC Prahova, in compliance with the legal provisions in force. ● the beneficiaries were not involved in activities to develop and maintain personal and social autonomy capacities, to develop and practise capacities and behaviours needed for adjustment to social life, though they were mentioned in the Individual Recovery Programme (C.I.T.O.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova county; C.R.R.N. Nedelea,Prahova county). Recommendation: to perform recovery and rehabilitation activities, occupational activities to develop the beneficiaries’ abilities and mention them in the relevant reports; to develop specific programmes involving the beneficiaries in activities resulting in the restoration of normal functional capacities or the compensatory development of remaining healthy functions, as well as to reduce or mitigate behaviour disorders, so that the recommendations in the Individual Recovery Plan can be implemented. Answer: assessment reports were revised, i.e. they mention how the objectives in the Individual Intervention Plans were reached (C.I.T.O.P.A.H. Urlați, Prahova); plans and activities of occupational therapy and specific therapeutic programmes for the development of the psycho-behavioural capacities and skills needed for adjustment to 125