Placement Centre, district 2, Bucharest, did not provide an answer to the recommendations; ● a precarious state of cleanliness and hygiene of bedrooms was found, as the walls were dirty, scratched or had traces of hits; damaged ceiling, doors and damaged/broken doors or with faults at the locking system, electrical installations with missing or faulty elements, non-functional lighting devices; the persistence of an unpleasant smell, with barely breathable air; the children’s drawings were posted on the wall of one of the bedrooms with large nail-type thumbtacks, and the names and diagnostics of the beneficiaries in each room were posted on the door of every bedroom, which infringed the privacy of data on the health state of the residing children/young people; the walls of rooms connecting to the hall had transparent windows (the Ciresarii Emergency Care Centre, district 2, Bucharest; the Residential Centre for Children with Severe Disabilities, the Community Services Complex of Oltenita, Calarasi county; the “Casa Sperantei” Association of Campina, Prahova county; the Family Home for Residential Protection of Children “Novaci”, Pociovalistea, Gorj county). Regarding the found aspects, the People’s Advocate recommended that the management of the Centre should refurbish the space, replace the broken/damaged windows and doors, rearrange the ceiling and damaged walls, solve the failures of power installations, mount power switches and provide proper and functional lighting bodies, ensure the beneficiaries’ privacy in the rooms by equipping windows with curtains, regularly ventilating the areas. Furthermore, a recommendation was provided to remove the diagnostic of beneficiaries who lived in a room from the door of the room, in order to ensure the privacy of data on the children’s/youth’s state of health and to use suitable methods to apply drawings on the walls of the bedroom without risks for the beneficiaries. The answer provided by the visited units stipulated that actions were taken with a view to fulfilling the recommendations, with internal notes/reports to DGASPC, as the case may be; the required actions were taken (the Residential Centre for Children with Severe Disabilities, the Community Services Complex of OltenitaCălărași county). ● the furniture was old and worn, some beds were equipped with rusty/not finished metal corners and sheets tied with irons; some of the beds were smaller than the beneficiaries’ height; some of the rooms did not have a family appearance (they 155