Communication No. 415/1990 Submitted by: Dietmar Pauger Date of communication: 5 June 1990 Alleged victim: The author State party: Austria Date of adoption of Views: 26 March 1992 (forty-fourth session) amendment of the challenged law would provide the author with an appropriate remedy. After the State party, in letters dated 11 September 1992 and 27 April 1993, invoked the “non-binding character” of the Committee’s recommendations, the author filed a new communication dated 22 January 1996 with the Committee, registered as No. 716/1996. Response, dated 11 August 1992, of the Government of Austria to the Committee’s Views* By a note dated 11 August 1992, the State party informed the Committee that it could not compensate the author for lack of enabling legislation. The State party implied that ___________ * For the Committee’s Views, see this volume, supra, p. 122. 133