perpetrated on 7 March 1986 against the Banco
de Pichincha and the Caja de Credito Agricola of
Sangolqui. He denies any involvement in the
offence.
a group of armed men belonging to the terrorist
movement “Alfaro vive”, robbed the bank of
Pichincha and the Caja de Credito Agricola of
Sangolqui.
2.4
On 27 January 1987 the Tribunal
Segundo Penal de Pichincha convicted and
sentenced him to one year of imprisonment.
Although this term was fully served on 7 March
1987 and the Tribunal ordered his release
on 9 March 1987, he was not released but instead
re-indicted, allegedly on the same facts and for
the same offence.
4.2
According to the police report, eight
persons were involved in the hold-up of the two
banks, escaping in a pick-up truck, of which the
author was said to be the driver. A police car
which followed them was able to arrest three of
them after a shoot-out. The remaining five were
apprehended later. The report does not specify
when or where Mr. Terán Jijón was apprehended.
2.5
With regard to the issue of exhaustion of
domestic remedies, Mrs. Terán Jijón states that
she instituted an action for amparo, appealed to
the Tribunal de Garantias Constitucionales and to
the National Congress. On 18 March 1988, her
son was released, pending the adjudication of
other criminal proceedings, involving charges of
illegal possession of fire arms. On 22 August
1989, the Fourth Chamber of the Superior Court
declared the charges null and void; it found that
the re-indictment of the author in January 1987
violated article 160 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, according to which no one shall be
tried or convicted more than once for the same
offence.
4.3
The State party denies that Mr. Terán
Jijón was at any time subjected to ill-treatment in
detention. It further contends that the judicial
proceedings against the author were at all times
conducted in conformity with the procedures
established under Ecuadorian law.
4.4
With respect to the second indictment
against Mr. Terán Jijón, the State party explains
that it was not based on the charge of bank
robbery, but rather on the charge of illegal
possession of fire arms.
Issues and proceedings before the Committee
5.1
During its 39th session, the Committee
considered
the
admissibility
of
the
communication and noted that the State party,
while addressing issues of merit, had not shown
whether any investigation with regard to the
allegations of torture had taken place or was in
progress, nor contended that effective domestic
remedies remained open to the author. In the
circumstances, the Committee concluded that the
requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the
Optional Protocol had been met.
3.
It is claimed that Juan Terán Jijón is a
victim of violations by Ecuador of article 7 of the
Covenant, because he was subjected to torture
and ill-treatment following his arrest, partly in
order to extract a confession from him and in
order to force him to sign blank sheets of paper,
about whose subsequent use he was kept in the
dark: the author adds that he was denied access
to counsel. It is further claimed that he was a
victim of a violation of article 9, paragraph 1,
because he was subjected to arbitrary arrest and
detention, since he allegedly was not involved in
the bank robbery: in this context, it is submitted
that the police report incriminating him was
manipulated by the Ministry responsible for the
police (Ministerio de Gobierno y Policia). The
author further alleges a violation of article 9,
paragraph 3, because he was not brought
promptly before a judge. The fact of having been
re-indicted for the same facts and the same
offence is said to amount to a violation of the
principle ne bis in idem.
5.2
The Committee further noted that the
facts as submitted appeared to raise issues under
provisions of the Covenant which had not
specifically been invoked by the authors. It
reiterated that whereas authors must invoke the
substantive rights contained in the Covenant,
they are not required, for purposes of the
Optional Protocol, necessarily to do so by
reference to specific articles of the Covenant. So
as to assist the State party in preparing its
submission under article 4, paragraph 2, of the
Optional Protocol, the Committee suggested that
the State party should address the allegations
(a) under article 10 of the Covenant, that Juan
Terán Jijón was subjected to ill-treatment during
detention, (b) under article 14, paragraph 3(b),
The State party’s information and observations:
4.1
The State party contends that
on 7 March 1986 Juan Terán Jijón, together with
77
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents