• Where the recipient is a State, it maintains adequate civilian oversight of
security institutions;
• Any attempts to retaliate against victims, witnesses or perpetrators have
received an appropriate response from authorities in the recipient’s
jurisdiction;
• If the purpose can lead to a sanction or other negative consequence for
an individual, the recipient guarantees appropriate procedural fairness,
commensurate with the seriousness of the sanction/consequence, in
rendering its decisions;
• For judicial systems:
- Indicia of independence;
- Lack of indicia of discrimination;
- Broad respect for fair trial standards;
- Enforcement of decisions, including contempt;
- Proper appellate review;
- Existence of a witness protection programme; and
- Absence of the death penalty.
When deciding whether to share information confidentially with any entity, the
investigative body should assess the totality of the circumstances. Even after such
an assessment it is important to recall that, once information has been shared, the
investigative body or, subsequently, OHCHR, loses control of it and can no longer
ensure confidentiality.138
Sharing within the United Nations, where recipients would be subject to SOPs on the handling of such
information, may pose less risk, but does not alleviate it altogether.
138
82
ATTRIBUTING INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents