Example 2: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (2014) The mandate of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea CoI did not require it to identify alleged perpetrators. The Commission nevertheless wrote a letter to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Supreme Leader sharing with him the findings contained in its final report. The Commission drew the Supreme Leader’s attention to the principles of command and superior responsibility under international criminal law and urged him to prevent and suppress the alleged crimes and violations. The CoI sought as well that alleged perpetrators be prosecuted.150 Alternatives within public revelation Certain alternatives have been employed that allow the public provision of information on implicated individuals. A demonstrator beaten by police while commemorating an apartheid-era massacre in Cape Town, South Africa. UN Photo A/HRC/25/63, annex I. 150 88 ATTRIBUTING INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY