Each Minister is asked to inform the CGLPL of his/her agreement or disagreement concerning each of the recommendations or observations received and, in the former case, to implement the necessary internal monitoring and follow-up procedures for guaranteeing that the agreement expressed is acted upon as well as, where applicable, initiate the necessary interministerial work. 1.3 The updated recommendations In the analysis of the responses that the Ministers gave to the general recommendations, the CGLPL found there to be a series of typical scenarios that are fairly simple to characterise and which lead to an update in the recommendations: - the recommendation was acted upon under conditions which, overall, the findings in the institutions in 2017 corroborate; in other words, a rule was updated and the new measure applied: ▪ the CGLPL does not outline any updated recommendation; - the recommendation led to an amendment in the regulations generally in line with the guidance given, but in practice the CGLPL finds that, in the institutions, the resources are not available or the new rule is not known: ▪ the CGLPL updates its recommendation by focusing on the points relating to its implementation; - the recommendation has only partially been acted upon: ▪ the CGLPL updates its recommendation by focusing on the part that has not been implemented; - the authorities do not agree with the recommendation, on grounds that the CGLPL concedes are justified: ▪ the previous recommendation is scrapped and no update is outlined; - the authorities do not agree with the recommendation, on grounds that the CGLPL does not consider justified: ▪ the recommendation is repeated exactly as before; - the authorities do not agree with the recommendation, on grounds that the CGLPL does not consider justified and, moreover, the CGLPL believes that a key fundamental right is under threat: ▪ the recommendation is repeated exactly as before and at the same time the CGLPL alerts Parliament or the international organisations tasked with supervising respect for fundamental rights in France. Regarding the recommendations specific to institutions, only a general assessment of the institution's situation is given below, together with an opinion expressed by the CGLPL on its progress as presented by the Minister concerned. Updated recommendations are rare, since it is only in the wake of on-site inspections that recommendations can be made on situations which need to be appraised by observing them in practice. As such, the recommendations set out below concern: - situations which warrant a general recommendation, particularly when it is a question of solving a structural difficulty encountered across a number of identical institutions; - measures to be taken so as to disseminate good practices; - ad hoc measures of such significance that ministerial intervention seems justified. 44