2.19.2. 2.19.3. 2.19.4. 2.19.5. from serving the sentence or replacing the sentence remainder with a more lenient type of sentence. The legislation shall remove the implicit obstacles to a convict’s access to judicial appeal of the question of early conditional release from serving the sentence or replacing the sentence remainder with a more lenient type of sentence, and equal time periods shall be prescribed for the new examination in case of both appealing and not appealing the final act. Appropriate legislative and practical solutions shall be designed for securing the separate discussion of the question of early conditional release from serving the sentence and the question of replacing the sentence remainder with a more lenient type of sentence. Legislative changes need to be made to secure accessible and predictable procedures and criteria for early conditional release from serving the sentence. Steps need to be taken for developing the capacity of the State Probation Service if the latter becomes engaged with respect to early conditional release from serving the sentence or replacing the sentence remainder with a more lenient type of sentence. 2.20. Issues Related to the Application of Amnesty in the Context of Crime Prevention and Resocialization of Persons Who Committed a Crime 2.20.1. To reduce the perpetration of repeat offences after an amnesty, resocialization of persons who committed a crime shall be a key focus of the state’s penitentiary policy in the penitentiary and post-penitentiary phases. 2.20.2. Resocialization shall be carried out by means of implementing sufficient education programs and elaborate and targeted courses in the PIs and practical 45