CCPR/C/112/D/2105/2011 persons. The Committee therefore considers that the allegations under article 14, paragraph 7, of the Covenant have not been sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol. 8.7 The Committee notes the authors’ allegations in relation to article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant that the State party’s judicial authorities should have grouped together the criminal charges against them in order to examine them during a single trial, as they were founded on related facts. The Committee considers that this complaint has been insufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and deems it to be inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol. 9. Therefore, the Committee decides: (a) Protocol; (b) GE.14-20560 That the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional That this decision shall be transmitted to the State party and to the authors. 9