Recommendation
(E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.5)
The 1996 Compensation
Relating to Torture Act is not in
line with the Convention’s
requirements for effective
remedies.
Steps taken in previous years
(See A/HRC/4/33/Add.2 and
A/HRC/7/3/Add.2)
2007: Since 1996, Nepalese police has
taken departmental action against 21
police personnel in 11 cases for alleged
torture, out of which 6 cases led to
prosecutions.
Steps taken since December 2007/current
situation
has been prosecuted for the many cases
of serious beatings which occurred in the
context of the protests
• There have been no independent
investigations into the allegations of
systematic torture and disappearances in
2003/2004 by the Bhairabnath Battalion,
which were documented in OHCHR’s
May 2006 report. In December 2007, a
site was identified where the body of one
of the disappeared may have been
cremated. A group of Finnish forensic
experts visited the country in
January 2008 and assisted local experts
in the exhumation of some of the
remains. As of early November 2008,
however, the results of the exhumations
have not been made public
Non-governmental sources: torture suspects
are not prosecuted or punished. In a few
cases, police have been briefly suspended
pending an internal inquiry. Impunity for
current and past crimes continues. Not a
single member of the security forces or the
CPN-M has been held criminally
accountable or convicted for acts of torture,
other ill-treatment or other human rights
abuses committed during the conflict.
Instead, attempts to grant amnesties for
severe human rights violations continue
despite the Government’s plans to set up the
A/HRC/10/44/Add.5
page 71
(j) Any public official
indicted for abuse or
torture, including
prosecutors and judges
implicated in colluding
in torture or ignoring
evidence, be
immediately suspended
from duty pending
trial, and prosecuted
Situation during visit
(See E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.5)
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents