Case Date of adoption Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable Article of Covenant violated Interim measures granted and State party’s response Remedy No. 60/1996 M’Barek v. Tunisia (cont’d) No. 63/1997 Arana v. France 5 June 2000 Spanish to Spain Complainant’s expulsion to Spain constituted a violation of article 3 Requested not acceded to by the State party, which claimed to have received Committee’s request after the expulsion of the complainant.3 Measures to be taken Follow-up session the Committee considered that the Rapporteur should arrange to meet with a representative of the State party. On 8 January 2001, the State party provided follow-up information, in which it stated that, although the Administrative Court of Pau had found the informal decision to directly hand over the complainant from the French to the Spanish police to be unlawful, the decision to deport him was lawful. The State party added that the ruling, which was currently being appealed, was not typical of the jurisprudence on the subject. It also submitted that since 30 June 2000, a new administrative procedure allowing for a summary judgement suspending a decision, including a deportation decision, had been instituted. The conditions that need to be proven to exist for Further action 61