Case No. 91/1997 A. v. The Netherlands (cont’d) No. 97/1997 Orhan Ayas v. Sweden Date of adoption Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable Article of Covenant violated Interim measures granted and State party’s response 12 Nov. 1998 Turkish to Turkey 3 Granted and acceded to by the State party No.101/1997 Halil Haydin v. Sweden 20 Nov. 1998 Turkish to Turkey 3 Granted and acceded to by the State party No. 110/1998 Chipana v. Venezuela 10 Nov. 1998 Peruvian to Peru Complainant’s extradition to Peru constituted a violation of article 3 Granted but not acceded to by the State party4 Remedy any other country where he runs a real risk of being expelled or returned to Tunisia. The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning the complainant to Turkey or to any other country where he runs a real risk of being expelled or returned to Turkey. The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning the complainant to Turkey, or to any other country where he runs a real risk of being expelled or returned to Turkey. None Follow-up Further action No information provided Request information No information provided Request information On 13 June 2001, the State party reported on the conditions of detention of the complainant in the prison of Chorillos, Lima. On 23 November 2000, the Ambassador of Venezuela to Peru, together with representatives of the Peruvian administration, visited the complainant in prison. The Request update 63

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents