64 Case No. 110/1998 Chipana v. Venezuela (cont’d) Date of adoption Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable Article of Covenant violated Interim measures granted and State party’s response Remedy Follow-up team interviewed the complainant for 50 minutes, and she informed them that she had not been subjected to any physical or psychological mistreatment. The team observed that the prisoner appeared to be in good health. She had been transferred in September 2000 from the top security block to the “medium special security” block, where she had other privileges such as one hour of visits per week, two hours per day in the courtyard, and access to working and educational activities. By note verbale dated 18 October 2001, the State party forwarded a second report by the Defensor del Pueblo (Ombudsman) dated 27 August 2001 about the complainant’s conditions of detention. It included a report of a visit to the complainant in prison carried out on 14 June 2001 by a member of the Venezuelan Further action