Case No. 133/1999 Falcon Rio v. Canada (cont’d) Date of adoption Nationality of complainant and country of removal if applicable Article of Covenant violated Interim measures granted and State party’s response Remedy Follow-up denial of the initial request but would be able to examine all the facts and information, old and new, presented by the complainant. In this context, it contested the Committee’s finding in paragraph 7.5 of its decision in which it found that only new information could be considered during such a review. Finally, the State party contested the Committee’s view that a humanitarian remedy did not constitute an effective remedy and referred to previous cases of the Committee in which the Committee itself found such remedies to be effective.5 It argued that the risk of torture could constitute a humanitarian motive and that the court could be requested to grant suspensive effect pending such a decision. According to the State party, at the time of the Further action 71