CAT/C/62/D/695/2015 6.6 Accordingly, in the particular circumstances of the present case, the Committee considers that the complainant has failed to exhaust all domestic remedies since he did not file an application for judicial review of the pre-removal risk assessment decision of 8 June 2017 before the Federal Court. In light of this finding, the Committee does not deem it necessary to examine the State party’s assertion that the complaint is inadmissible as manifestly unfounded. 7. The Committee therefore decides: (a) That the complaint is inadmissible under article 22 (5) (b) of the Convention; (b) That this decision shall be communicated to the complainant and to the State party. 9