Planning
Assessment
tool
paragraph
NO Partial YES Comments
104. Do these criteria take into account the
type and size of institutions and their level,
and the nature of known human rights
problems?
22
105. Do these criteria leave room for flexibility
in the allocation of resources to ensure
that follow-up and urgent visits can be
undertaken?
22
106. Are these criteria transparent, clear and
published?
22
107. Is the visiting team composed of
individuals with the necessary knowledge
(i.e. languages and special needs/
vulnerable groups)?
23
108. Does the composition of the visiting team
take into account the experience and skills
of members?
23
109. Does the composition of the visiting team
take into account the need for a gender
balance?
23
110. Does the composition of the visiting team
ensure adequate representation of ethnic
and minority groups?
23
111. Does the visiting team have the necessary
human resources to enable it to carry out
its tasks adequately?
23
112. Does the visiting team have the necessary
technical resources to enable it to carry
out its tasks adequately?
23
113. Does the visiting team have the necessary
time available to enable it to carry out its
tasks adequately?
23
114. Has the NPM developed guidelines for
visits to the various categories of places
of detention? If yes, please give list in the
comments box.
24
115. Do these guidelines include instructions for
selecting the theme for a visit?
24
116. Do these guidelines include instructions for
conducting private interviews?
24
117. Do these guidelines include instructions
for developing policies for handling
vulnerable groups of detainees?
24
118. Do these guidelines include instructions
for ensuring that information is collected
from all available sources, such as from the
administration of the visited institution, from
staff, from detainees from all areas and
units, from other visitors if appropriate, and
from outside actors such as Civil Society
and other monitoring mechanisms?
24
119. Are all facilities within institutions visited,
bearing in mind the target of the visit?
25
120. Are existing registers assessed?
25
121. Are examples of case records assessed?
25
122. Are activities and services for the
detainees assessed?
25
123. Have practices and tools been developed
for cross-checking, testing and assessment
of observations?
26
Visit Methodology
58 I PREVENTING TORTURE: THE ROLE OF NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISMS – A PRACTICAL GUIDE
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents