Foreword
The death penalty is gradually disappearing from the OSCE region. With Uzbekistan
abolishing capital punishment on 1 January 2008, there are only two OSCE
participating States that still carry out executions.
OSCE commitments do not require the abolition of the death penalty. However,
participating States have committed themselves to using the death penalty as
punishment for only the most serious crimes and in a manner not contrary to their
international commitments, and to keeping the question of capital punishment under
consideration.1 OSCE states have also committed themselves to making information
on the use of the death penalty available to the public.2
It is with a view to assisting participating States’ compliance with these
commitments that ODIHR has, since 1999, published an annual background paper
on the death penalty in the OSCE area for the Human Dimension Implementation
Meeting (HDIM). This background paper provides a forum for participating States
to make information on the use of the death penalty available. This year’s paper offers
a concise update that only highlights changes in the status of the death penalty since
the last publication.
ODIHR collected information for this paper from participating States
themselves,3 as well as from OSCE field presences,4 intergovernmental organizations,
non-governmental organizations, and media reports.
This paper classifies the participating States according to the categories of
abolitionist, partly abolitionist, de facto abolitionist, or retentionist, and outlines
country developments, if any, in all four categories with a more in-depth analysis of
developments in the retentionist countries.
1
For a list of relevant OSCE commitments, see Annex 1.
2
Copenhagen Document 1990, para. 17.8.
3 A copy of the questionnaire that was sent to participating States requesting information on the use of
the death penalty is attached as Annex 4. Of the seven recipients of the questionnaire, four participating
States responded: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Latvia, and the United States of America.
4 ODIHR is grateful to the OSCE Office in Minsk and the OSCE Centre in Astana for responding to
the questionnaire.
v