CAT/C/62/D/683/2015 Committee considers that the information submitted by the complainant is insufficient to establish his claim that he would be at a foreseeable, real and personal risk of torture if he were returned to the Sudan.37 8. Accordingly, the Committee, acting under article 22 (7) of the Convention, concludes that the decision of the State party to return the complainant to the Sudan would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention. 37 12 See, for example, S.A. v. Sweden (CAT/C/32/D/243/2004), para. 4.2; and W.G.D. v. Canada (CAT/C/53/D/520/2012), para. 8.7.