Remedy recommended The State party has an obligation to refrain from forcibly returning the complainant to Iran or to any other country where she runs a real risk of being expelled or returned to Iran. Due date for State party response None Date of reply 22 February 2001 State party response The State party informed the Committee that on 30 January 2001, the Aliens Appeals Board examined a new application for residence permit lodged by the complainant. The Board decided to grant the complainant a permanent residence permit in Sweden and to quash the expulsion order. The Board also granted the author’s son a permanent residence permit. Author’s response None Committee’s decision No further consideration under the follow-up procedure as the State party has complied with the Committee’s decision. Case Chedli Ben Ahmed Karoui, 185/2001 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Tunisian to Tunisia Views adopted on 8 May 2002 Issues and violations found Removal - article 3 Interim measures granted and State party response Granted and acceded to by the State party Remedy recommended None Due date for State party response None Date of reply 23 August 2005 State party response No further consideration under follow-up procedure. See first follow-up report (CAT/C/32/FU/1) in which it was stated that, on 4 June 2002, the Board revoked the expulsion decisions regarding the complainant and his family. They were also granted permanent residence permits on the basis of this decision. 108