complainant in prison carried out on 14 June 2001 by
a member of the Venezuelan Embassy in Peru
together with the head of Criminal and Penitentiary
Affairs in Peru. She stated that her conditions of
detention had improved and that she could see her
family more often. However, she informed them
both of her intention to appeal her sentence.
According to the Ombudsman, the complainant had
been transferred from the medium special security
pavilion to the “medium security” pavilion where she
had more privileges. Furthermore, since
4 December 2000, all the top security prisons in the
country have a new regime consisting of (a) Visits:
Removal of booths. Any visit from any family
member or friend will be accepted with no
restrictions; (b) Media: Complainant has access to
any media without restriction; (c) Lawyers: Free
visits without restrictions four times a week;
(d) Courtyard: Freedom of circulation until
2200 hours. He concluded that the complainant has
more flexible conditions of detention due to her
personal situation and to the changes introduced on
4 December 2000. Moreover, her health is good,
except that she is suffering from depression. She had
not been subjected to any physical or psychological
mistreatment, she has visits of her family weekly and
she is involved in professional and educational
activities in the prison.
On 9 December 2005, the State party informed the
Committee that on 23 November 2005, the
Venezuelan Ambassador in Peru contacted
Mrs. Nuñez Chipana in the maximum security prison
for women in Chorrillos, Lima. According to the
note, Venezuelan authorities have been lobbying to
prevent the complainant from being sentenced to the
death penalty, life imprisonment or more than
30 years’ imprisonment, or subjected to torture or
mistreatment. In the interview held with the
complainant, she regretted that the Peruvian
authorities of Chorrillos had denied access to her
brother, who had come from Venezuela to visit her.
She mentioned that she is receiving medical treatment
and that she can receive visits from her son, and that
she is under a penitentiary regime which imposes
minimum restrictions on detainees. She added that
she received visits every six months from members of
the Venezuelan Embassy in Peru. The State party
121
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents