points out that the situation in Peru has changed since the Committee adopted its decision. There is no longer a pattern of widespread torture, and the Government is engaged in redressing the victims of human rights abuses of the past regime. The complainant has been visited on a regular basis and she has not been subjected to torture or any other ill-treatment. The State party considers that its commitment to ensure, through monitoring, that the complainant is not subjected to treatment or punishment contrary to the Convention, has been met. The Government also considers that it has complied with the recommendation that similar violations should be avoided in the future. It informed the Committee that since the adoption of the law on refugees in 2001, the newly established National Commission for Refugees has been duly processing all the applications of asylum-seekers as well as examining cases of deportation. The Government asks the Committee to declare that the former has complied with the Committee’s recommendations, and to release the Government from the duty to monitor the situation of the deportee in Peru. Author’s response None Complaints in which the Committee has found no violations of the Convention up to the thirty-sixth session but in which it requested follow-up information State party GERMANY Case M.A.K., 214/2002 Nationality and country of removal if applicable Turkish to Turkey Views adopted on 12 May 2004 Issues and violations found No violation Interim measures granted and State party response Granted and acceded to by the State party. Request by State party to withdraw interim request refused by the Special Rapporteur on new communications. 122