A/HRC/4/33/Add.2
Page 110
those involved in the arrest or questioning of the detainees or the investigation of the
incident provoking the detention. Police officers should not be present during the medical
examination. Protocols should be established to assist forensic doctors in ensuring that the
medical examination of detainees is comprehensive. Medical examinations should not be
performed within the State Security Court facilities. Medical certificates should never be
handed to the police or to the detainee while in the hands of the police, but should be made
available to the detainee once out of their hands and to his or her lawyer immediately.
622.
According to information received from NGOs and other sources, the Forensic
Medicine Institution, which is primarily responsible for documentation of torture and illtreatment, is dependent on the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its personnel are State employees.
In the past, medical reports of independent physicians have not been taken into account in court
cases relating to torture or ill-treatment. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1 June
2005, victims, accused persons, prosecutors and judges can now demand an independent expert
opinion. However, this opinion only constitutes supplementary evidence to the views of the
official health institution. Concern is raised about the provision in the Code of Criminal
Procedure according to which security officials, who have been involved in the arrest and/or
interrogation of the detainee, can transfer this person to his or her medical examination.
Furthermore, they can be present during the examination in order to ensure the personal security
of the physician. Confidentiality of medical records has been violated at a number of occasions,
and there are claims that security officers have even sought to influence the content of medical
reports.
623.
The Government drew the Special Rapporteur’s attention to the relevant sections of
CPT’s report on its visit in December 2005 [CPT/Inf (2006) 30, para. 25, 26], according to
which “The provisions of the revised Regulation on Apprehension concerning the system for the
medical examination of persons in police/gendarmerie custody are consistent with CPT’s
previous recommendations on this subject. In particular, it is spelt out that the examination must
take place in the absence of law enforcement officials, unless the doctor requests their presence
in a particular case; further, emphasis is placed on ensuring the confidentiality of the report sent
to the public prosecutor. CPT also welcomes the stipulation that the doctor should immediately
notify the public prosecutor if he makes any findings indicative of the offences of torture or illtreatment. The December 2005 visit offered another opportunity to review the operation of the
system; for this purpose, the delegation heard the accounts of numerous persons who were (or
had recently been) in custody, interviewed doctors called upon to examine detainees as well as
police/gendarmerie officers, and examined medical reports drawn up following such
examinations. As regards the issue of the confidentiality of the medical examinations, the
information gathered indicates that it is still far from being guaranteed. Most detained persons
claimed that they had been examined in the presence of law enforcement officials, and such a
practice was openly acknowledged by medical staff at Van State Hospital. Similarly, the
requirement that the report be transmitted to the prosecutor in a closed and sealed envelope was
often not being complied with. From the information gathered it would also appear that detained
persons were still usually medically examined with their clothes on and that, in most cases, the
medical findings were limited to "No signs of physical ill-treatment/injuries". The poor quality of
the medical reports drawn up after these examinations, and the obstacles this raised in the
context of legal proceedings in respect of allegations of ill-treatment, was highlighted by one
senior public prosecutor met by the delegation during the visit.”
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents